September 13, 2023 – Strasbourg
Martin spoke again in a European Parliament on “Health & Democracy under WHO’s new proposed rules,” organized by critical MEPs (including Christine Anderson). It occurred during a plenary session but was not an official committee or full-Parliament proceeding. Dr. Peter McCullough spoke first.
Martin (founder/chairman of M·CAM, specializing in intellectual property, innovation finance, and intangible assets) has a background that includes work on biological and chemical weapons proliferation assessment for U.S. government-related efforts in the late 1990s–early 2000s.
Core Content of the Speech
Martin declared he was “done talking about COVID and SARS-CoV-2” in isolation because the real issue is a 110-year criminal conspiracy by a small group of industrial interests that subordinated humanity for enrichment, impoverishment, and killing. He argued the WHO (roots tied by him to early 20th-century developments around the 1913 Clayton Act on interlocking directorates, eugenics-influenced population ideas, and post-WWII founding in the 1940s) has operated from inception with criminal intent rather than as a genuine public-health body.
He outlined a recurring four-step process attributed to the WHO and associated actors:
Legal characterization: Organized criminal conspiracy/racketeering resulting in global terrorism. He rejected debating amendments or “modified agreements” to WHO instruments (the contemporaneous context of proposed pandemic treaty and IHR changes) as missing the point—like negotiating currency during a bank robbery. His explicit call: “Don’t just limit the power of the WHO. Destroy the WHO.” Treat it as a criminal organization to be ended, with prosecution of perpetrators.
Plan it (simulations, exercises, and preparedness scenarios).
Fund it.
Create it (pathogens, rationales, or medical countermeasures).
Deploy and profit from it.
Key claims and supporting points he advanced include:
The organization and its partners use language such as “acceptable death rate,” which he said marks a loss of humanity’s moral plot (attributing this phrasing to WHO, Pfizer, and Moderna contexts).
Violations of antitrust and competition laws, including the U.S. Sherman/Clayton Act framework and EU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Article 101 (on restrictive agreements and concerted practices). He framed funding dominance (notably large private contributions, e.g., from the Gates Foundation) as directed donations that enable racketeering, conflicts of interest, and money-laundering-like patterns, contrary to charters.
Specific historical examples: Alleged harms in vaccine trials (e.g., a 2011 malaria vaccine trial he described as resulting in higher deaths in the vaccine arm, with controls not receiving pure saline, and linked to WHO/Wellcome/Gates funding and immunity provisions under WHO rules that he said shield accountability). Ties to earlier eugenics or population-control ideas.
COVID-19 as the execution of the model: Continuity with gain-of-function and synthetic coronavirus work (echoing his May timeline, including UNC Chapel Hill exemptions, DARPA-linked discussions of bio-warfare enabling technologies, 2016 papers on viruses “poised for human emergence,” and 2019 simulations/predictions of a respiratory pathogen crisis to drive universal vaccine acceptance). He portrayed data manipulation, inflated pandemic narratives, and vaccine deployment as part of global terrorism for profiteering and murder.
Financial outcomes: Massive profits (e.g., Pfizer figures, Moderna royalties linked to NIH), WHO budget expansion requests, and revolving interests.
